[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Meu6-5569rMcV0zf2V+Sz_QZgShoEhmhw41k6fczULcoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 11:19:54 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>, Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, Juan Yescas <jyescas@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 21/21] regulator: s2mps11: enable-gpios is optional on s2mpg1x
On Sat, Dec 27, 2025 at 1:24 PM André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> For s2mpg1x, enable-gpios is optional, but when not given, the driver
> is complaining quite verbosely about the missing property.
>
> Refactor the code slightly to avoid printing those messages to the
> kernel log in that case.
>
I don't get the point of this - you added this function in the same
series, why can't it be done right the first time it's implemented?
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists