[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ-ks9krE2+K0mVkG-Ao9VAuyDqdAoPbWAK7fHyoVZD6ww=zyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 15:34:24 -0500
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...nel.org>
To: Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] scripts: generate_rust_analyzer: match rust/Makefile
On Fri, Jan 2, 2026 at 3:05 PM Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri Jan 2, 2026 at 4:25 PM CET, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > @Benno would you mind having a look at this series?
>
> Oh wow this is an old series! Sorry for missing it.
>
> I'm not maintaining the build system for pin-init, but from my side the
> changes look okay. The commit messages are missing some context though:
> why do we need these dependency edges? etc. If you fix that you can add
>
> Acked-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>
>
> Also note that this might be different in the new build system.
Thanks for the review! I think the commits all include answers to
"why": the first two make RA match the actual build and the final one
does the same and also fixes navigation in pin_init_internal; before
this series, go-to-symbol from pin_init_internal to e.g.
proc_macro::TokenStream doesn't work.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists