[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F002D2DE9196BF8A+aV9I4lkCHzU9QB5H@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 14:04:18 +0800
From: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@...ux.spacemit.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>,
Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@...ux.spacemit.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
spacemit@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: add syscon property
On Thu, Jan 01, 2026 at 11:54:02PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi Troy,
>
> thanks for your patch!
>
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 10:11 AM Troy Mitchell
> <troy.mitchell@...ux.spacemit.com> wrote:
>
> > + spacemit,apbc:
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> > + items:
> > + - items:
> > + - description: phandle to syscon that access the protected register
> > + - description: offset of access secure registers
> (...)
> > + spacemit,apbc = <&syscon_apbc 0x50>;
>
> Isn't the offset implicit from the compatible of the pin controller or
> the syscon or any other compatible?
>
> It's easy to check compatibles in the device tree and just say
> this offset is 0x50 if compatible is so-or-so, and something else
> for another compatible and just give an error if an unknown
> compatible appears.
>
> So: please try to avoid to put things the code can easily look
> up into the device tree.
Thanks for you pointing it out. I'll remove it.
- Troy
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists