linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: dt-platdev: Add ti,am62l3 to blocklist

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260116100614.k2loytoywr4vqihu@lcpd911>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:36:14 +0530
From: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Viresh Kumar
	<viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra
	<vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
	<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Kendall Willis <k-willis@...com>, Sebin Francis
	<sebin.francis@...com>, Bryan Brattlof <bb@...com>,
	<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: dt-platdev: Add ti,am62l3 to blocklist

On Jan 16, 2026 at 10:16:08 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/01/2026 10:01, Dhruva Gole wrote:
> > Add AM62L3 SoC to the dt-platdev blocklist to ensure proper handling
> > of CPUFreq functionality. The AM62L3 will use its native TI CPUFreq
> > driver implementation instead of the generic dt-platdev driver.
> > 
> > This follows the same pattern as other TI SoCs like AM62A7, AM62D2,
> > and AM62P5 which have been previously added to this blocklist.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> > index 1708179b2610bca6035d10f0f4766eee6f73912e..29122bac2e22f6e7a8e8294cc01923c8a13d53c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id blocklist[] __initconst = {
> >  	{ .compatible = "ti,am62a7", },
> >  	{ .compatible = "ti,am62d2", },
> >  	{ .compatible = "ti,am62p5", },
> > +	{ .compatible = "ti,am62l3", },
> 
> p > l

Fair point, I thought more from a "latest SOC" point of view but the
standard here is alphabetical, will re-spin.

> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

-- 
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole
Texas Instruments Incorporated