[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260121113659.CCJtYuQS@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 12:36:59 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: request_irq() usage in wm8350_register_irq().
On 2026-01-21 11:22:32 [+0000], Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> Or because request_threaded_irq() supplies a default handler, so
> handler!=NULL when it calls __setup_irq().
>
>
> int request_threaded_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
> irq_handler_t thread_fn, unsigned long irqflags,
> const char *devname, void *dev_id)
> {
>
> ...
>
> if (!handler) {
> if (!thread_fn)
> return -EINVAL;
> handler = irq_default_primary_handler;
> }
>
> ...
>
>
> retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, action);
>
> ...
> }
->
| } else if (new->handler == irq_default_primary_handler &&
| !(desc->irq_data.chip->flags & IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE)) {
…
| pr_err("Threaded irq requested with handler=NULL and !ONESHOT for %s (irq %d)\n",
| new->name, irq);
| ret = -EINVAL;
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists