[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXhaoRMIlbRVgZui@stanley.mountain>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 09:26:41 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Ethan Tidmore <ethantidmore06@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>,
Akiyoshi Kurita <weibu@...admin.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] staging: rtl8723bs: rename members of struct
registry_priv
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 08:15:43AM -0600, Ethan Tidmore wrote:
> @@ -750,7 +751,8 @@ s8 phy_get_tx_pwr_lmt(struct adapter *adapter, u32 reg_pwr_tbl_sel,
>
> void PHY_ConvertTxPowerLimitToPowerIndex(struct adapter *Adapter)
> {
> - struct hal_com_data *pHalData = GET_HAL_DATA(Adapter);
> + struct hal_com_data *pHalData = GET_HAL_DATA(Adapter);
This is an unrelated white-space change. Don't make unrelated changes.
> + struct registry_priv *r = &Adapter->registrypriv;
I feel like you did this to avoid going over the 100 character limit,
but please do that in a separate patch. I use a script to review these
changes and I want it to be a straight s/old/new/ change. Plus, "r"
is a bad name.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists