[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3f7ce0e-4661-4542-9ea0-168d28a483c8@vaisala.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 12:01:07 +0200
From: Tomas Melin <tomas.melin@...sala.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] iio: adc: ad9467: check for backend capabilities
On 09/02/2026 10:41, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 09:24:09AM +0200, Tomas Melin wrote:
>> On 05/02/2026 18:34, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 12:24:11PM +0000, Tomas Melin wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>>> + if (iio_backend_has_caps(st->back, IIO_BACKEND_CAP_BUFFER)) {
>>>> + ret = devm_iio_backend_request_buffer(&spi->dev, st->back,
>>>> + indio_dev);
>>>
>>> With
>>>
>>> struct device *dev = &spi->dev;
>>>
>>> at the top, this one becomes exactly a 80 character line.
>>> And in general it will help cleaning up the rest afterwards.
>>
>> Given it seems it would still be 81 characters long I would like to
>> leave this change as it also creates a bit of noise.
>
> ret = devm_iio_backend_request_buffer(dev, st->back, indio_dev);
>
> We have different arithmetics for sure, I have it 80.
Indeed this seems to be the case, different editors count this
differently :D
-T
>
> "There are *two* problems in programming: naming, cache invalidation,
> and off-by-one error."
>
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists