[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070320215012.GA4089@sortiz.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:50:12 +0200
From: Samuel Ortiz <samuel@...tiz.org>
To: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...xity.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] Fix initialization of spinlock in irttp_dup()
Hi Deepak,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 12:22:33PM -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> This was found around the 2.6.10 timeframe when testing with the -rt patch
> and I believe is still is an issue. irttp_dup() does a memcpy() of the tsap_cb
> structure causing the spinlock protecting various fields in the structure to be
> duped. This works OK in the non-RT case but in the RT case we end up with two
> mutexes pointing to the same wait_list and leading to an OOPS. Fix is to simply
> initialize the spinlock after the memcpy().
This has just made it to the netdev and stable trees.
See:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7bb1bbe615de25d955b974cb47d40fa198154bb9
Cheers,
Samuel.
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...sta.com>
>
> diff --git a/net/irda/irttp.c b/net/irda/irttp.c
> index a7486b3..df2b2f7 100644
> --- a/net/irda/irttp.c
> +++ b/net/irda/irttp.c
> @@ -1441,6 +1441,7 @@ struct tsap_cb *irttp_dup(struct tsap_cb
> }
> /* Dup */
> memcpy(new, orig, sizeof(struct tsap_cb));
> + spin_lock_init(&new->lock);
>
> /* We don't need the old instance any more */
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irttp->tsaps->hb_spinlock, flags);
>
>
> --
> Deepak Saxena - dsaxena@...xity.net - http://www.plexity.net
>
> In the end, they will not say, "those were dark times," they will ask
> "why were their poets silent?" - Bertolt Brecht
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists