[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OF6A57F86D.C63329E8-ON652572D6.0027B2E9-652572D6.00289106@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 12:53:05 +0530
From: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Optimize return value of qdisc_restart
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote on 05/09/2007 12:06:30 PM:
> But this only makes sense for the second hunk you changed.
I think it should work fine for both.
> The first hunk is a bug case, an improper looping device
> decapsulation condition, and we do want to always return
> -1 in that case in order to break out of the loop.
I guess you meant "we do *not* want to always return -1" ?
> Your change will make the kernel essentially hang instead
> when this bug check is triggered.
By returning -1, we end up freeing all the skbs one by one, or
until the condition : "transient error caused by hard_start_xmit
recursing" is over. Essentially, that behavior is also not
changed in my patch (only run time change is to return 0 if
there are no more skbs).
Thanks,
- KK
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists