[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071221.014310.155404661.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:43:10 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: paul.moore@...com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
latten@...tin.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] XFRM: RFC4303 compliant auditing
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:42:25 -0500
> This patch adds a number of new IPsec audit events to meet the auditing
> requirements of RFC4303. This includes audit hooks for the following events:
>
> * Could not find a valid SA [sections 2.1, 3.4.2]
> . xfrm_audit_state_notfound()
> . xfrm_audit_state_notfound_simple()
>
> * Sequence number overflow [section 3.3.3]
> . xfrm_audit_state_replay_overflow()
>
> * Replayed packet [section 3.4.3]
> . xfrm_audit_state_replay()
>
> * Integrity check failure [sections 3.4.4.1, 3.4.4.2]
> . xfrm_audit_state_icvfail()
>
> While RFC4304 deals only with ESP most of the changes in this patch apply to
> IPsec in general, i.e. both AH and ESP. The one case, integrity check
> failure, where ESP specific code had to be modified the same was done to the
> AH code for the sake of consistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
This doesn't apply at all to net-2.6.25, in particular
xfrm6_input_addr() doesn't even have a local variable
named "xfrm_vec_one" let alone the conditional where you're
adding the state notfound audit hook.
Please respin this and the third patch, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists