[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48143ADE.40304@iki.fi>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:35:42 +0300
From: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [IPV4]: Update MTU to all related cache entries in ip_rt_frag_needed()
David Miller wrote:
> From: Timo_Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>
> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:05:27 +0300
>
>> Add struct net_device parameter to ip_rt_frag_needed() and update MTU to
>> cache entries where ifindex is specified. This is similar to what is
>> already done in ip_rt_redirect().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Timo Teras <timo.teras@....fi>
>
> I haven't forgotten about this patch, I'm just still thinking about
> possible negative side effects. I don't think there are any, but
> I want to be sure.
>
> This function has been a constant source of consternation. It also
> doesn't do the right thing when the TOS is modified mid-network, and
> that's arguably wrong too but more difficult to solve efficiently than
> this ifindex keying case.
I understand your concern. It is pretty easy break routing cache with
some seemingly unrelated changes. I tried to think about possible side
effects, but concluded that this should be safe. Then again, I don't
know all the tiny details and unusual scenarios. But I have been running
a 2.6.23 kernel with (backported) patch on a production machine (router
connected to two ISPs, internal subnet and also having multiple gre
tunnels), so far I have not encountered any problems.
Cheers,
Timo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists