[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200805282309.13628.opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 23:09:13 +0300
From: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: race in skb_splice_bits?
On Wednesday 28 May 2008, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >> We queue data under the lock and clone appropriate skb (and then grab it
> >> multiple times), so even it will be dropped, its data will not freed,
> >> and thus we will be able to read it. Or you are talking about different
> >> skbs?
> >
> > You are right, I forgot about the clone.
>
> Probably I miss something, but how does it help when tcp_collapse()
> uses __kfree_skb()?
>
__kfree_skb() -> skb_release_all() -> skb_release_data():
static void skb_release_data(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if (!skb->cloned ||
<snip>
kfree(skb->head);
Since we clone the skb in skb_splice_bits() the skb's data will only be freed
when the last clone is deleted.
tavi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists