[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4921C3FD.106@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:20:29 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Cleanup of af_unix
Joe Perches a écrit :
> On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 07:46 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> [PATCH] net: Cleanup of af_unix
>>
>> This is a pure cleanup of net/unix/af_unix.c to meet current code style standards
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
>> ---
>> net/unix/af_unix.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>> 1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>> plain text document attachment (af_unix_cleanup.patch)
>> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
>> index 4a39771..58db2a2 100644
>> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
>> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
>> @@ -354,7 +353,7 @@ static void unix_sock_destructor(struct sock *sk)
>> WARN_ON(!sk_unhashed(sk));
>> WARN_ON(sk->sk_socket);
>> if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
>> - printk("Attempt to release alive unix socket: %p\n", sk);
>> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "Attempt to release alive unix socket: %p\n", sk);
>> return;
>> }
>>
>
> Well, perhaps not quite pure.
> The KERN_ level selection is debatable.
> This could or perhaps should be KERN_INFO.
Thanks Joe
[PATCH] net: af_unix should use KERN_INFO instead of KERN_DEBUG
As spotted by Joe Perches, we should use KERN_INFO in unix_sock_destructor()
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
View attachment "af_unix_printk.patch" of type "text/plain" (454 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists