[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1231955073.11301.161.camel@lb-tlvb-eliezer>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:44:33 +0200
From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>
To: "Ben Hutchings" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
cc: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/34]bnx2x: Compilation issue on IA64
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 09:07 -0800, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 18:43 +0200, Eilon Greenstein wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>
[...]
> > #ifdef BNX2X_STOP_ON_ERROR
> > fp->tpa_queue_used |= (1 << queue);
> > -#ifdef __powerpc64__
> > +#if (defined __powerpc64__) || (defined _ASM_IA64_TYPES_H)
> > DP(NETIF_MSG_RX_STATUS, "fp->tpa_queue_used = 0x%lx\n",
> > #else
> > DP(NETIF_MSG_RX_STATUS, "fp->tpa_queue_used = 0x%llx\n",
>
> Or you could cast the value to unsigned long long and remove this
> fragile #ifdef.
>
You are right - it is a better solution. The issue is that this uglier
solution is already in, and I hate to re-send this patch just for this.
Can we have this one applied and I will re visit it in net-next?
Eilon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists