[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1231964842.3010.46.camel@achroite>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:27:22 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/34]bnx2x: Setting the GSO_TYPE with LRO
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 07:18 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com> wrote:
> >>
> > This is far from bullet proof solution, but IMHO it is better set then
> > not this way, you stand a chance (depending on the output device
> > capabilities)
>
> The question is simple, does your hardware guarantee that on
> output GSO will turn the packet into exactly the same sequence
> of packets that was seen on input, with no changes (apart from
> what the stack would have done to them anyway, e.g., TTL update)
> whatsoever?
>
> If not then you mustn't set this and also you must disable it
> if forwarding/bridging is used.
The driver just has to cooperate with dev_disable_lro() in order for the
forwarding/bridging code to disable it. Then skb_warn_if_lro() should
catch the case where the user mistakenly turns it back on. However,
setting gso_type on input subverts this check.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists