[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A661EBA.7040206@candelatech.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:02:02 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: veth: Zero timestamp in xmit path.
On 07/21/2009 12:51 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Greear<greearb@...delatech.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:46:55 -0700
>
>> This patch zero's the timestamp before handing the packet to
>> the peer interface. This lets the peer recalculate the rx timestamp
>> if it cares about timestamps.
>>
>> The patch is against net-next, compile tested there. Similar patch
>> was
>> functionally tested against 2.6.31-rc3.
>>
>>
>> Signed-Off-By: Ben Greear<greearb@...delatech.com>
>
> Oh, where to begin... sigh...
>
> The "off" and "by" in "Signed-off-by" is not capitalized.
>
> There should not be two spaces after the Signed-off-by colon, there
> should be only one.
>
> There should be a space between your name and your<> enclosed email
> address.
I had no idea that was so important.
>
>> @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ static int veth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
>> net_device *dev)
>
> Your email client corrupted the patch by splitting up this line.
>
> This is all just being sloppy, and it shows a lack of care put
> into your submission.
I sent as attachment as well to help mitigate this. If sending only
an attachment is better, I will do so next time.
> Nevertheless I'm a sucker and I fixed this all up and applied your
> patch.
As always, your forbearance is appreciated!
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists