[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090814.001519.40499255.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jens@...one.net
Cc: joe@...ches.com, chuck.lever@...cle.com, brian.haley@...com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ipv6: Change %pI6 format to output compacted addresses?
From: Jens Rosenboom <jens@...one.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:22:05 +0200
> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:31 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:13:42 -0700
>>
>> > On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 17:02 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> >> [ I would think user space in general should be using inet_pton(3)
>> >> everywhere for such interfaces, so the format of these addresses
>> >> wouldn't matter so much. Probably impossible at this point. ]
>> >
>> > David Miller is authoritative here.
>>
>> In the final analysis, the risk is just too high to break
>> userspace. So let's play conservative here and not change
>> the output for currently user visible stuff.
>
> So just to clarify, do you want us to drop the whole thread and stay
> with the clumsy output, or would you be o.k. with adding a new
> %p{something} and use that for kernel messages and maybe do some slow
> migration of other stuff where possible?
You tell me what part of this you don't understand:
So let's play conservative here and not change
the output for currently user visible stuff.
I can't figure out a way to express that more clearly than I did.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists