netdev - Re: [PATCH net-2.6] can: Use WARN_ONCE() instead of BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A851C4C.8060704@hartkopp.net>
Date:	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:11:56 +0200
From:	Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	urs@...ogud.escape.de, l.fu@...gutronix.de,
	m.olbrich@...gutronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6] can: Use WARN_ONCE() instead of BUG_ON() for
 sanity check in receive path

David Miller wrote:
> From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>
> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:57:02 +0200
> 
>> David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>
>>> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:27:09 +0200
>>>
>>>> Additionally it changes the return values to the common NET_RX_xxx constants.
>>> Don't munge unrelated changes together like this, split it up.
>>>
>>> Also, this is not net-2.6 material, I will only apply these changes
>>> to net-next-2.6 at this point.
>> No problem.
>>
>> Btw. this patch was removed from patchwork and i was not able to find it in
>> your latest net-next-2.6 push this morning.
> 
> It's not in net-next-2.6 because I didn't apply it, which is pretty
> clealy implied when I'm asking you to split the change up into
> multiple patches.

Sorry - i assumed this to be a hint for the next time. My fault.

> 
> When I ask for changes, I mark the patch in patchwork with the
> "changes requested" state and expect you to send me new updated stuff.
> 
> You can look for patches in various "done" states by simply modifying
> the "Filters" setting in the patch list.

Ah! I only had the filters on 'action required' and therefore is was not able
to see what happened after the patches were removed from the 'action required'
view ...

I'll re-send two separate patches for net-next-2.6 .

Thanks,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html