netdev - Re: [PATCH] TCPCT-1: adding a sysctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AC69B89.5010604@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:32:09 -0400
From:	William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCPCT-1: adding a sysctl

David Miller wrote:
> From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
>> Ummm, I was following the suggested practice of breaking it into
>> smaller
>> pieces for review.  This is just the control functions and headers.
>> I've
>> actually completed most of the port, and am champing at the bit.
> 
> We can't review the helper functions and infrastructure properly until
> we can see how they are actually used.
> 
> Seeing how they are used shows us how well they are designed.
> 
> Otherwise asking for a is absolutely pointless as we have no context
> in which to judge the code you're showing us.
> 
Thanks.  I'd hand-split my code into much smaller patches for review.
Now, I know there are patches that are *too* small....

I've merged the several things you've mentioned, and will post it soon
(after making sure it compiles and runs separately).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html