netdev - Re: PF_RING: Include in main line kernel?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200910141319.43884.bcook@bpointsys.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:19:43 -0500
From:	Brent Cook <bcook@...intsys.com>
To:	Brad Doctor <brad.doctor@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Luca Deri <deri@...p.org>
Subject: Re: PF_RING: Include in main line kernel?

On Wednesday 14 October 2009 09:33:08 Brad Doctor wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> On behalf of the users and developers of the PF_RING project, we would
> like to ask consideration to include the PF_RING module in the main
> line kernel.
> 
> PF_RING (http://www.ntop.org/PF_RING.html) is a kernel module that
> implements an mmap()-ed memory ring for accelerating packet capture
> and for providing all the basic features a network monitoring
> application needs. PF_RING includes several features such as packet
> filtering, balancing across capture applications, packet reflection
> (i.e. capture application can decide to bounce selected packets onto
> an as-specified interface). Packets are filtered both using BPF and
> using ACL-like rules (e.g. tcp and ports from 80 to 100). Using
> PF_RING it is also possible to exploit multiple RX queues provided by
> modern NIC adapters. PF_RING achieves a significant speedup by making
> only one copy of the packet. Additionally, PF_RING is able to operate
> in a capture-only installation, further increasing performance.

What is the difference between PF_RING and the existing
PACKET_RX_RING support (which is now complemented by PACKET_TX_RING). 

ggaoed makes use of both of these, though it is one of the few open-source projects I've found that do: http://code.google.com/p/ggaoed/

I've used PACKET_RX_RING with SO_ATTACH_FILTER to implement filtering via BPF code. You can also set PACKET_COPY_THRESH to filter on size, etc. Has anyone done a PF_RING/PACKET_RX_RING speed comparison? They seem feature-wise pretty similar.

> PF_RING has been around since 2003 and is very mature with an active
> contributing developer base. The developer and user community use a
> mailing list (http://listgateway.unipi.it/pipermail/ntop-misc/) for
> discussions and submissions. PF_RING is used in several projects,
> ranging from distributions such as DD-WRT/OpenWrt to improving
> performance of applications like Snort and Wireshark. Many commercial
> companies around the world in the field of intrusion detection and
> traffic analysis rely on PF_RING for accelerating their products and
> operations.
> 
> The PF_RING module relies on a small patch to net/core/dev.c that
> intercepts when a packet is received/transmitted so that it can be
> passed to the PF_RING module when present and with an active listener.
> Other than these minor changes, all the PF_RING code is
> self-contained, comprising jut two files: ring.c and ring.h. PF_RING
> is the result of many years of research and development specifically
> into high-speed packet capture, and is homegrown. PF_RING uses the
> stock GPL license.
> 
> We feel that PF_RING is ready to be included with the mainline kernel.
> We are ready and eager to support PF_RING for the long term.
> 
> Thank you in advance for your consideration!
> 
> -brad
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html