Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:33:28 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Brad Doctor <brad.doctor@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Luca Deri <deri@...p.org>
Subject: Re: PF_RING: Include in main line kernel?

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:02:45 -0600
Brad Doctor <brad.doctor@...il.com> wrote:

> Good point for sure. We will make the change and get back to you.
> Thanks for the quick reply, we appreciate it very much!
> 
> -brad
> 
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Stephen Hemminger
> <shemminger@...tta.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:33:08 -0600
> > Brad Doctor <brad.doctor@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> On behalf of the users and developers of the PF_RING project, we would
> >> like to ask consideration to include the PF_RING module in the main
> >> line kernel.
> >>
> >> PF_RING (http://www.ntop.org/PF_RING.html) is a kernel module that
> >> implements an mmap()-ed memory ring for accelerating packet capture
> >> and for providing all the basic features a network monitoring
> >> application needs. PF_RING includes several features such as packet
> >> filtering, balancing across capture applications, packet reflection
> >> (i.e. capture application can decide to bounce selected packets onto
> >> an as-specified interface). Packets are filtered both using BPF and
> >> using ACL-like rules (e.g. tcp and ports from 80 to 100). Using
> >> PF_RING it is also possible to exploit multiple RX queues provided by
> >> modern NIC adapters. PF_RING achieves a significant speedup by making
> >> only one copy of the packet. Additionally, PF_RING is able to operate
> >> in a capture-only installation, further increasing performance.
> >>
> >> PF_RING has been around since 2003 and is very mature with an active
> >> contributing developer base. The developer and user community use a
> >> mailing list (http://listgateway.unipi.it/pipermail/ntop-misc/) for
> >> discussions and submissions. PF_RING is used in several projects,
> >> ranging from distributions such as DD-WRT/OpenWrt to improving
> >> performance of applications like Snort and Wireshark. Many commercial
> >> companies around the world in the field of intrusion detection and
> >> traffic analysis rely on PF_RING for accelerating their products and
> >> operations.
> >>
> >> The PF_RING module relies on a small patch to net/core/dev.c that
> >> intercepts when a packet is received/transmitted so that it can be
> >> passed to the PF_RING module when present and with an active listener.
> >> Other than these minor changes, all the PF_RING code is
> >> self-contained, comprising jut two files: ring.c and ring.h. PF_RING
> >> is the result of many years of research and development specifically
> >> into high-speed packet capture, and is homegrown. PF_RING uses the
> >> stock GPL license.
> >>
> >> We feel that PF_RING is ready to be included with the mainline kernel.
> >> We are ready and eager to support PF_RING for the long term.
> >>
> >> Thank you in advance for your consideration!
> >
> > I was going to wrap pfring up for the staging tree.
> > The code you put in network receive path is not necessary;
> > it would be cleaner to just use existing packet type all hook, and
> > then PF_RING could be a loadable module without having to be compiled in.
> >
> > --
> >

If you want, I'll try and do it. Are there any tests other
than just ntop?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists