netdev - Re: [PATCH] skbuff: align sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:14:02 +0100
From:	Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>
To:	"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@...il.com>
CC:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] skbuff: align sk_buff::cb to 64 bit

On 2010-01-29 11:54 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 02:42:03PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
>> Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> > The alignment requirement for 64-bit load/store instructions on ARM is
>> > implementation defined. Some CPUs (such as Marvell Feroceon) do not
>> > generate an exception, if such an instruction is executed with an
>> > address that is not 64 bit aligned. 
>> > In such a case, the Feroceon corrupts adjacent memory, which showed up
>> > in my tests as a crash in the rx path of ath9k that only occured with
>> > CONFIG_XFRM set. This crash happened, because the first field of the
>> > mac80211 rx status info in the cb is an u64, and changing it corrupted
>> > the skb->sp field.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>
>> > Cc: stable@...nel.org
>> > ---
>> > --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
>> > @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ struct sk_buff {
>> >  	 * want to keep them across layers you have to do a skb_clone()
>> >  	 * first. This is owned by whoever has the skb queued ATM.
>> >  	 */
>> > -	char			cb[48];
>> > +	char			cb[48] __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>> >  
> I'd guess the problem is with the accessor to the thing.
> something in the opaque cb ptr its beeing accessed wroingly causing
> overwrites.
Nope, the problem is not with the accessor, I verified that. The start
address of the datastructure that gets put into skb->cb correctly points
at the start of the cb, and it is only aligned to 4 byte, not 8. Also,
this issue only happens on CPUs that do not throw an unaligned exception
for this instruction.

- Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html