[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1267529982.9365.7.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:39:42 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [rfc/rft][patch] should use scheduler sync hint in
tcp_prequeue()?
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 12:27 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> This wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll() change might be good for loopback
> communications (and pleases tbench), but is it desirable for regular
> multi flows NIC traffic ?
If you can take high frequency cache misses, likely yes. For localhost,
that's pretty much guaranteed currently (ergo the question).
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists