netdev - Re: [rfc/rft][patch] should use scheduler sync hint in tcp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1267530068.9365.8.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date:	Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:41:08 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [rfc/rft][patch] should use scheduler sync hint in
 tcp_prequeue()?

On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 12:32 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 12:27 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > My Q6600 has shared caches 
> 
> Isn't core2quad a dual die construct, having 2 cache domains?

(yes.. am I using wrong terminology?)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html