[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C223310.6090006@trash.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:15:12 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: "Gerd v. Egidy" <lists@...dy.de>
CC: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>, timo.teras@....fi,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about xfrm by MARK feature
Gerd v. Egidy wrote:
> Hi Jamal,
>
> while looking through the 2.6.34 changelog I found the xfrm by MARK feature
> you developed in february. I'm currently working on NAT for ipsec connections
> and thought your feature might help me.
>
> For example I have 2 different remote networks with the same ip network each
> and both of them have a tunnel to the same local network. I map their IPs to
> something different so I can distinguish them in the local network. But after
> the nat the xfrm code sees two tunnels with exactly the same values. So this
> can't work.
>
> But if I understood your feature correctly, I can now mark the packets (e.g.
> in iptables with ... -j MARK --set-mark 1) and have xfrm select the correct
> ipsec tunnel via the mark. Correct?
>
> But does your feature also set the mark on packets decrypted by xfrm? I need
> some way to find out from which tunnel the packet came to correctly treat it.
>
You should be able to use the policy match to distinguish the tunnels,
f.i. by matching on the tunnel endpoints.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists