[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTilxqHHiDfzQbewBe8cnTtvdB9CCTPn9EVCcAf5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:54:32 +0530
From: ratheesh k <ratheesh.ksz@...il.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: Netfilter mailing list <netfilter@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nat bypass
> Let me try and understand this.
>
> R is routing between 192.168.1.0/24 and 10.232.18.0/24.
> As A is on the 192.168.1.0/24 side of R.
> But to give A an 10.232.18.0/24 address (dynamically)?
>
> Why?
>
For some clients , R should act as a mere bridge , Not a router .
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 03:43:46PM +0530, ratheesh k wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A -------> R ------->S
>>
>> I have a linux machine A is connected to Linux machine R . Machine R
>> is having two network interfaces and acting as a router .
>> It has a dhcp server running . It will assign ip in 192.168.1.0/24
>> subnet to all machine connected on lan side ( A is connected also in
>> lan side ) . Wan side of R is connected to HTTP server S . There is
>> also a DHCP server running on S to assign ip in 10.232.18.0/24 subnet
>> . Is there any way , in which NAT should be bypassed to get ip from
>> DHCP server running on S . My question is : How can A will get an ip
>> from 10.232.18.0/24 pool ip .?
>> ebtables is an option ? How can we make it ?
>> Is there any other optimal way ?
>
> Let me try and understand this.
>
> R is routing between 192.168.1.0/24 and 10.232.18.0/24.
> As A is on the 192.168.1.0/24 side of R.
> But to give A an 10.232.18.0/24 address (dynamically)?
>
> Why?
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists