[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinh6pAT9PsHZa1vaD6uQQZY_qWV68Bmx--f0Y4m@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:20:55 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: jdelvare@...e.de, bruce.w.allan@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000e: Simplify MSI interrupt testing
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 20:13, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:45:39 +0200
>
>> The code is quite convoluted, simplify it. This also avoids calling
>> e1000_request_irq() without testing the value it returned, which was
>> bad.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
>> Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
>> Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>> ---
>> I understand that we need to request the IRQ again after testing, but
>> why doing it twice?
>>
>> I sent this patch to the e1000-devel list on August 26th, 2010, but
>> didn't receive any answer:
>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=201008261445.44334.jdelvare%40suse.de&forum_name=e1000-devel
>
> Intel folks, please provide feedback or else I'll just blindly apply Jean's
> patch to the net-next-2.6 tree as long as it compiles ;-)
> --
Sorry, I believe this patch is good to go. I am still trying to catch
up on email after being out on vacation.
Let me verify that we tested this patch and get back to you (later
tonight) Dave.
--
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists