[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikdYi-Cs=4UtjJx-X4bW+LSKTQBTcSv23NS2S+S@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:05:01 +0800
From: Junchang Wang <junchangwang@...il.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Xinan Tang <xinan.tang@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: increase skb->users instead of skb_clone()
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com> wrote:
> In dev_queue_xmit_nit(), we have to clone skbs as we need to mangle skbs,
> however, we don't need to clone skbs for all the packet_types.
>
> Except for the first packet_type, we increase skb->users instead of
> skb_clone().
Hi Changli,
Take af_packet for example, I can't see benefit from this patch.
> +static inline int deliver_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> + struct packet_type *pt_prev,
> + struct net_device *orig_dev)
> +{
> + atomic_inc(&skb->users);
> + return pt_prev->func(skb, skb->dev, pt_prev, orig_dev);
> +}
The increment call will incur skb_shared() failure in packet_rcv.
In reality, packet_rcv has to clone this packet by itself.
Thanks
--
--Junchang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists