[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=DvyuZeWzzi5WJR7AeTZba+U7Vz9cJYR5uRBVc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:12:11 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: Junchang Wang <junchangwang@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Xinan Tang <xinan.tang@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: increase skb->users instead of skb_clone()
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Junchang Wang <junchangwang@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Changli,
> Take af_packet for example, I can't see benefit from this patch.
>
>> +static inline int deliver_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> + struct packet_type *pt_prev,
>> + struct net_device *orig_dev)
>> +{
>> + atomic_inc(&skb->users);
>> + return pt_prev->func(skb, skb->dev, pt_prev, orig_dev);
>> +}
> The increment call will incur skb_shared() failure in packet_rcv.
> In reality, packet_rcv has to clone this packet by itself.
>
>
This happens when run_filter returns non zero. For your case, only
small parts of packets match bpf filter.
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists