[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd3bebd7-d92d-4485-b4a6-413df763b985@CMEXHTCAS1.ad.emulex.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 04:45:03 +0000
From: "Perla, Sathya" <Sathya.Perla@...lex.Com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Seetharaman, Subramanian" <subbu.seetharaman@...lex.com>,
"Khaparde, Ajit" <Ajit.Khaparde@...lex.Com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] benet: Wait f/w POST until timeout
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
>
> From: Gavin Shan <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:48:46 +0800
>
> > While PCI card faces EEH errors, reset (usually hot reset) is expected
> > to recover from the EEH errors. After EEH core finishes the reset, the
> > driver callback (be_eeh_reset) is called and wait the firmware to
> > complete POST successfully. The original code would return with error
> > once detecting failure during POST stage. That seems not enough.
> >
> > The patch forces the driver (be_eeh_reset) to wait the firmware
> > completes POST until timeout, instead of returning error upon
> > detection POST failure immediately. Also, it would improve the
> > reliability of the EEH funtionality of the driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> I know that patch #2 of this series needs to be implemented differently, but this
> patch seems fine.
>
> So can I get an ACK from one of the benet driver folks?
Acked-by: Sathya Perla <sathya.perla@...lex.com>
thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists