[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1366898314.8964.135.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:58:34 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jesse@...ira.com,
horms@...ge.net.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org, xeb@...l.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GRE: Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL in gre_gso_segment
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 17:11 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> In any case, returning an error in this case makes little sense
> because when we return NULL it is precisely because the packet is
> well-formed and ready for direct processing by the hardware which
> will perform GSO instead of us.
>
> The reason this dichotomy exists is because we've reused the
> normal software GSO path to do header verification for hardware
> GSO.
>
OK, then current code is fine. Comments will save future 'cleanups'.
diff --git a/net/ipv4/gre.c b/net/ipv4/gre.c
index d2d5a99..ddf72eb 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/gre.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/gre.c
@@ -168,7 +168,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *gre_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
/* segment inner packet. */
enc_features = skb->dev->hw_enc_features & netif_skb_features(skb);
segs = skb_mac_gso_segment(skb, enc_features);
- if (!segs || IS_ERR(segs))
+ /* if no segmentation is needed, we're done */
+ if (!segs)
+ goto out;
+ /* if an error happened during segmentation, we're done */
+ if (IS_ERR(segs))
goto out;
skb = segs;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists