[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130711200206.GA12611@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 22:02:06 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ipv6: only static routes qualify for equal cost multipathing
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:44:19AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:02:31 +0200
>
> > + for (rt = rt0; rt && !(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_EXPIRES);
> > + rt = (struct rt6_info *)rt->dst.from);
> > + return !(rt && (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_EXPIRES));
>
> Please make this logic clearer, something like:
>
>
> for (rt = rt0; rt; rt = (struct rt6_info *)rt->dst.from) {
> if (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_EXPIRES)
> return false;
> }
> return true;
Ok, I'll revisit this. The reason for this loop (which was taken from
rt6_update_expires) is, that it was only valid to dereference dst.from if
RTF_EXPIRES was not set (before commit ecd9883 ("ipv6: fix race condition
regarding dst->expires and dst->from") dst.from and dst.expires were a
union). I tried to keep this (possible) invariant.
I'll check if this is still needed.
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists