netdev - [PATCH net-next v2] ipv6: fib6_rules should return exact return value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130801065447.GE3688@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date:	Thu, 1 Aug 2013 08:54:47 +0200
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	stefan.tomanek@...tarbyte.de, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] ipv6: fib6_rules should return exact return value

With the addition of the suppress operation
(7764a45a8f1fe74d4f7d301eaca2e558e7e2831a ("fib_rules: add .suppress
operation") we rely on accurate error reporting of the fib_rules.actions.

fib6_rule_action always returned -EAGAIN in case we could not find a
matching route and 0 if a rule was matched. This also included a match
for blackhole or prohibited rule actions which could get suppressed by
the new logic.

So adapt fib6_rule_action to always return the correct error code as
its counterpart fib4_rule_action does. This also fixes a possiblity of
nullptr-deref where we don't find a table, thus rt == NULL. Because
the condition rt != ip6_null_entry still holdes it seems we could later
get a nullptr bug on dereference rt->dst.

v2:
a) Fixed a brain fart in the commit msg (the rule => a table, etc). No
   changes to the patch.

Cc: Stefan Tomanek <stefan.tomanek@...tarbyte.de>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
---
 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c b/net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c
index e64e6a5..554a4fb 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c
@@ -55,26 +55,33 @@ static int fib6_rule_action(struct fib_rule *rule, struct flowi *flp,
 	struct fib6_table *table;
 	struct net *net = rule->fr_net;
 	pol_lookup_t lookup = arg->lookup_ptr;
+	int err = 0;
 
 	switch (rule->action) {
 	case FR_ACT_TO_TBL:
 		break;
 	case FR_ACT_UNREACHABLE:
+		err = -ENETUNREACH;
 		rt = net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry;
 		goto discard_pkt;
 	default:
 	case FR_ACT_BLACKHOLE:
+		err = -EINVAL;
 		rt = net->ipv6.ip6_blk_hole_entry;
 		goto discard_pkt;
 	case FR_ACT_PROHIBIT:
+		err = -EACCES;
 		rt = net->ipv6.ip6_prohibit_entry;
 		goto discard_pkt;
 	}
 
 	table = fib6_get_table(net, rule->table);
-	if (table)
-		rt = lookup(net, table, flp6, flags);
+	if (!table) {
+		err = -EAGAIN;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
+	rt = lookup(net, table, flp6, flags);
 	if (rt != net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry) {
 		struct fib6_rule *r = (struct fib6_rule *)rule;
 
@@ -101,6 +108,7 @@ static int fib6_rule_action(struct fib_rule *rule, struct flowi *flp,
 	}
 again:
 	ip6_rt_put(rt);
+	err = -EAGAIN;
 	rt = NULL;
 	goto out;
 
@@ -108,7 +116,7 @@ discard_pkt:
 	dst_hold(&rt->dst);
 out:
 	arg->result = rt;
-	return rt == NULL ? -EAGAIN : 0;
+	return err;
 }
 
 static bool fib6_rule_suppress(struct fib_rule *rule, struct fib_lookup_arg *arg)
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html