[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1380911146.3564.27.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 11:25:46 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: do not forget FIN in tcp_shifted_skb()
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 21:03 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Nice that it was finally found. For some reason my memory tries to say
> that it wouldn't have not even tried to merge skbs with FIN but either
> I changed that at some point while deving or I just remember wrong.
>
> Acked-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
>
Thanks for reviewing.
It looks like I chose the opposite strategy in tcp_try_coalesce() :
Not allowing a merge if the FIN was set of the skb.
But really it seems we could have the merge.
I'll test the following before official submission.
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index fa6cf1f..90cf0b3 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -4119,9 +4119,6 @@ static bool tcp_try_coalesce(struct sock *sk,
*fragstolen = false;
- if (tcp_hdr(from)->fin)
- return false;
-
/* Its possible this segment overlaps with prior segment in queue */
if (TCP_SKB_CB(from)->seq != TCP_SKB_CB(to)->end_seq)
return false;
@@ -4134,6 +4131,10 @@ static bool tcp_try_coalesce(struct sock *sk,
NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPRCVCOALESCE);
TCP_SKB_CB(to)->end_seq = TCP_SKB_CB(from)->end_seq;
TCP_SKB_CB(to)->ack_seq = TCP_SKB_CB(from)->ack_seq;
+
+ if (tcp_hdr(from)->fin)
+ tcp_hdr(to)->fin = 1;
+
return true;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists