[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131125192334.580400ef@endymion.delvare>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19:23:34 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Nithin Nayak Sujir <nsujir@...adcom.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org, Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 0/5] net: hwmon fixes
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:15:50 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 09:07 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Yes, I know about that one. It concluded that it would be too invasive
> > and risky to try to fix it without access to hardware to test the results.
> > That is why I said "fixes _most_ of the problems".
> >
> > As for why the attributes are created after registration, it was most likely
> > because there was no API available to attach the sysfs attributes to
> > the hwmon device in a clean way. The new APIs fix that.
>
> We don't attach them to the hwmon device either, and I would rather not
> change that yet because lm-sensors 2 is still widely used.
Mouahahahah.
No, seriously, it's not. And lm-sensors 2 doesn't even support your
device so this is a totally moot point.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists