[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVgo+nxN3eTRg_F9u+-k4ML+D3ZqsrAEOeLZwtU6dOk3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:33:50 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] net_sched: remove get_stats from tc_action_ops
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:21 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
>> From: Cong Wang
>>
>> It is not used.
> ...
>> --- a/include/net/act_api.h
>> +++ b/include/net/act_api.h
>> @@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ struct tc_action_ops {
>> __u32 capab; /* capabilities includes 4 bit version */
>> struct module *owner;
>> int (*act)(struct sk_buff *, const struct tc_action *, struct tcf_result *);
>> - int (*get_stats)(struct sk_buff *, struct tc_action *);
>> int (*dump)(struct sk_buff *, struct tc_action *, int, int);
>> int (*cleanup)(struct tc_action *, int bind);
>> int (*lookup)(struct tc_action *, u32);
>
> Deleting a field out of the middle of a list of function pointers
> seems dangerous.
Why? Keep in mind that we don't need to worry about any
out-of-tree modules. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists