netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] net_sched: remove get_stats from tc_action

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:38:58 -0800
From:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] net_sched: remove get_stats from tc_action_ops

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>
> So where is you 0/6? ;->

It is there, just without any CC. :-)

> General: The spirit of the patches i find agreeable.
> I am against patch 1. Dont just remove ABI/APIs that exist.

I don't think we care about kernel module ABI in upstream,
nor we need to care about any out-of-tree module.
Otherwise they are already broken by any change of sk_buff, right?

> Some of these changes are substantial - did you do any testing?
> If you havent I can help - but at minimal i will ask you do so.
> I will also do more review then with whatever iteration you have around
> sunday. I have other patches i meant to  submit - but i will do them on
> top of yours.
>

Yes, but I just have testcase for u32 filter and basic filter with
mirred action. I don't have time to write testcases for other things
yet.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html