netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/6] net_sched: act: use standard struct list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVYkvpEH91y-c9ng4fpB+sayiTXnkkszw1=RosazeFuBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:48:09 -0800
From:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/6] net_sched: act: use standard struct list_head

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> On 12/13/13 00:47, Cong Wang wrote:
>>
>> Currently actions are chained by a singly linked list,
>> therefore it is a bit hard to add and remove a specific
>> entry. Convert it to struct list_head so that in the
>> latter patch we can remove an action without finding
>> its head.
>>
>
> Looks reasonable - but can you find a more usable noun
> than "head"?
>

My English is not good, I can only find "head" or "list" here,
please suggest other better names?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html