netdev - Re: [PATCH] ipv6: don't call addrconf_dst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52C4FDBE.5030607@huawei.com>
Date:	Thu, 2 Jan 2014 13:48:46 +0800
From:	chenweilong <chenweilong@...wei.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>,
	<kumaran.4353@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: don't call addrconf_dst_alloc again when enable
 lo

On 2013/12/31 11:57, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:05:32PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
>> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:14:30 +0800
>>
>>> If we disable all of the net interfaces, and enable
>>> un-lo interface before lo interface, we already allocated
>>> the addrconf dst in ipv6_add_addr. So we shouldn't allocate
>>> it again when we enable lo interface.
>>>
>>> Otherwise the message below will be triggered.
>>> unregister_netdevice: waiting for sit1 to become free. Usage count = 1
>>>
>>> This problem is introduced by commit 25fb6ca4ed9cad72f14f61629b68dc03c0d9713f
>>> "net IPv6 : Fix broken IPv6 routing table after loopback down-up"
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
>>
>> This is the second such regression added by that commit :-/
>>
>> Applied and queue up for -stable, thanks.
> 
> Hmm, and this change also has a regression and breaks the original fix. :/
> 
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67951
> 
> I tried to track it down but it seems pretty complicated. Maybe we have to
> special-case the take-down of the loopback device.
> 
> 
> 
Hi,

When I did the tests,If 'ifconfig lo down',all IPv6 connection broken,
but IPv4 connection were still OK.

Is it designed like that or a bug?

Thanks

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html