[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140111180025.GB6586@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:00:25 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Aruna-Hewapathirane <aruna.hewapathirane@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: replace macros net_random and net_srandom with direct calls to prandom
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 09:52:37AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 07:15 -0500, Aruna-Hewapathirane wrote:
> > This patch removes the net_random and net_srandom macros and replaces
> > them with direct calls to the prandom ones. As new commits only seem to
> > use prandom_u32 there is no use to keep them around.
> > This change makes it easier to grep for users of prandom_u32.
>
> Seems sensible.
>
> Also, there may be some value in a future patch
> to use reciprocal_divide in a few places
>
> > diff --git a/net/802/garp.c b/net/802/garp.c
> > @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static void garp_join_timer_arm(struct garp_applicant *app)
> > {
> > unsigned long delay;
> >
> > - delay = (u64)msecs_to_jiffies(garp_join_time) * net_random() >> 32;
> > + delay = (u64)msecs_to_jiffies(garp_join_time) * prandom_u32() >> 32;
>
> reciprocal_divide()
Does reciprocal_divide() make sense without reciprocal_value() from a
stylish point of view?
I wouldn't do that just because it expands into the same code.
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists