[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21221.47960.726835.615315@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:20:16 +0530
From: Sujith Manoharan <sujith@...jith.org>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
<ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux-Kernel\@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ath9k ARM build error with v3.13-8330-g4ba9920
Josh Boyer wrote:
> adds a udelay(10000) call to the ath9k driver. This will cause a
> build error on various ARM configs because the value passed to udelay
> is too large:
>
> ERROR: "__bad_udelay" [drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k_hw.ko] undefined!
> make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
> make: *** [modules] Error 2
>
> Is the 10000 microsecond udelay really required? I believe the limit
> on ARM is 2000. Perhaps something else could be done in this case?
The delay is a workaround for a HW issue. Does this patch fix the problem ?
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
index fbf43c0..11eab9f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
@@ -1316,7 +1316,7 @@ static bool ath9k_hw_set_reset(struct ath_hw *ah, int type)
if (AR_SREV_9300_20_OR_LATER(ah))
udelay(50);
else if (AR_SREV_9100(ah))
- udelay(10000);
+ mdelay(10);
else
udelay(100);
@@ -2051,9 +2051,8 @@ static bool ath9k_hw_set_power_awake(struct ath_hw *ah)
REG_SET_BIT(ah, AR_RTC_FORCE_WAKE,
AR_RTC_FORCE_WAKE_EN);
-
if (AR_SREV_9100(ah))
- udelay(10000);
+ mdelay(10);
else
udelay(50);
Sujith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists