netdev - RE: [PATCHv3 net-next 00/31] Misc. fixes for cxgb4 and iw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Mar 2014 17:58:19 -0600
From:	"Steve Wise" <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
To:	"'Hariprasad S'" <hariprasad@...lsio.com>,
	"'David Miller'" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	<roland@...estorage.com>, <kumaras@...lsio.com>, <dm@...lsio.com>,
	<leedom@...lsio.com>, <santosh@...lsio.com>,
	<nirranjan@...lsio.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv3 net-next 00/31] Misc. fixes for cxgb4 and iw_cxgb4

> > BTW, if you're frustrated from having to send these patches so many
> > times because of changes being requested, this is the main reason
> > why you shouldn't queue up such enormous numbers of patches at one
> > time.
> >
> > Please try to keep your future submissions sizes more reasonable,
> > perhaps ~10 patches or so at most.
> >
> > Thanks.
> 
> Sure, thanks for the suggestion.
> I will just re-post the revert patch on cxgb4 now, part of this
series, which is
> causing regression.
> And, I will split the rest of patch-series into 8-10 patches and
re-submit.

I think you should keep this series as-is since folks have been
reviewing it as such.  
Then going forward, we need to submit smaller sets more frequently...

Steve.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html