netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: syncookies: do not use getnstimeofday()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140320.161619.826791792330039198.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:16:19 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	fw@...len.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: syncookies: do not use getnstimeofday()

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:07:39 -0700

> On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 15:36 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> 
>> This applies cleanly to net-next, but with this Fixes: tag I sort of
>> suspect you are targetting this at net instead?
>> 
>> Please be explicit as to what the target tree is when submitting
>> patches in the future.
> 
> Well, I've always tagged net-next patches with net-next, and used no tag
> for fixes.
> 
> If you want me to add net tag, I am totally fine.
> 
> So yes, this was a fix for net tree, but there is no hurry if you
> applied to net-next its also fine.

The confusion came mostly because it applied perfectly to net-next, but
with fuzz to plain net. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html