[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396371315.22689.9.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:55:15 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, VenkatKumar.Duvvuru@...lex.Com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 0/2] patchset: Support for configurable RSS
hash key
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 12:20 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Venkata Duvvuru <VenkatKumar.Duvvuru@...lex.Com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 15:19:48 +0000
>
> >> > By grouping the key and hash together, with some reserved fields
> >> > (which the setter should initially require to be equal to zero), it
> >> > should be possible to fill in support for numbered RSS contexts later
> >> > without yet another new structure and operations.
> >
> >
> >> If that is the case, why don't we add from the start a "u32 rss_context;"
> >> field that has to be set to zero for now?
> >
> > The current structure has got three u32 reserved fields already. We could use one of them when the support is added.
>
> Just do as I said, naming one of those to "rss_context" now, and require
> that it be zero.
I agree, I think that makes sense for the initial definition.
Sorry about all the back-and-forth discussion on this, Venkata.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists