[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140625114500.7c09874e@haswell>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:45:00 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, pshelar@...ira.com,
cwang@...pensource.com, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, david@...son.dropbear.id.au,
sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com, sucheta.chakraborty@...gic.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 1/2] rtnetlink: allow to register ops
without ops->setup set
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:58:22 +0200
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> So far, it is assumed that ops->setup is filled up. But there might be
> case that ops might make sense even without ->setup. In that case,
> forbid to newlink and dellink.
>
> This allows to register simple rtnl link ops containing only ->kind.
> That allows consistent way of passing device kind (either device-kind or
> slave-kind) to userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Can't we fix these kind of devices to all create/delete. At least
allow delete.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists