netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] sctp: not send SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE notifications with failed probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:47:38 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To:	Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	vyasevich@...il.com, tuexen@...muenster.de,
	khandelwal.deepak.1987@...il.com, Yue.Tao@...driver.com,
	alexandre.dietsch@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	Zhu Yanjun <Yanjun.Zhu@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sctp: not send SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE notifications
 with failed probe

On 08/20/2014 11:31 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> Since the transport has always been in state SCTP_UNCONFIRMED, it
> therefore wasn't active before and hasn't been used before, and it
> always has been, so it is unnecessary to bug the user with a
> notification.
>
> Reported-by: Deepak Khandelwal <khandelwal.deepak.1987@...il.com>
> Suggested-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
> Suggested-by: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@...muenster.de>
> Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <Yanjun.Zhu@...driver.com>

Looks a bit better, thanks!

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html