[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1428198536.11260.128.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2015 02:48:56 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Eyal Perry <eyalpe@...lanox.com>,
Eyal Grossman <eyalgr@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool 3/5] ethtool: Return bad status when send_ioctl
fails
On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 15:51 +0200, Amir Vadai wrote:
> From: Eyal Grossman <eyalgr@...lanox.com>
>
> Added to ethtool return code(rc != 0) when an error occurs after send_ioctl has fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eyal Grossman <eyalgr@...lanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
I wish we could do this, but it's been returning 0 on failure for as
long as git history lasts (10 years) and I would expect this change to
break some scripts.
Maybe we could provide some way to opt-in to this behaviour?
[..]
> @@ -2654,17 +2661,20 @@ static int do_sset(struct cmd_context *ctx)
> err = send_ioctl(ctx, &edata);
> if (err < 0) {
> perror("Cannot get msglvl");
> + status += err;
> } else {
> edata.cmd = ETHTOOL_SMSGLVL;
> edata.data = ((edata.data & ~msglvl_mask) |
> msglvl_wanted);
> err = send_ioctl(ctx, &edata);
> - if (err < 0)
> + if (err < 0) {
> perror("Cannot set new msglvl");
> + status += err;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + return status;
This is going to be a negative number on error, which is not a valid
exit code. We should generally return 1 on error.
Ben.
> }
>
> static int do_gregs(struct cmd_context *ctx)
--
Ben Hutchings
Quantity is no substitute for quality, but it's the only one we've got.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists