[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150420193304.GD2416462@devbig242.prn2.facebook.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:33:05 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
<kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/10] ipv6: Avoid deleting RTF_CACHE route from
ip6_route_del()
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 02:23:05PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:54:09 -0700
>
> > Before patch 'Allow pmtu update on /128 via gateway route',
> > RTF_CACHE route was not created for DST_HOST. It also requires changes on both
> > delete code path and rt6_select() code patch.
> >
> > This patch fixes the delete code path to avoid deleting the RTF_CACHE
> > route by 'ip -6 r del...'
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
> > Reviewed-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
>
> If a cached route was created in response to say a PMTU event, and
> it's a clone/copy/cow of the route we are being asked to delete,
> it absolutely should be removed.
>
> In fact this is a critically important aspect of removing routes
> from the table.
When a non-clone routes are removed, its clones are removed together by
fib6_prune_clones() in fib6_del().
Hence, 'ip -6 r del' will remove a route and its clones.
'ip -6 r flush table cache will only remove RTF_CACHE routes.
I will fix up the commit message.
Thanks,
--Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists