netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/3] rcar_can: print signed IRQ #

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55858E8B.9000801@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Sat, 20 Jun 2015 18:02:19 +0200
From:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	wg@...ndegger.com, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rcar_can: print signed IRQ #

On 06/20/2015 04:38 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 6/20/2015 3:03 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 
>>> Printing IRQ # using "%x" and "%u" unsigned formats isn't quite correct as
>>> 'ndev->irq' is of  type *int*, so  the "%d" format  needs to be used instead.
> 
>>> While fixing this, beautify the dev_info() message in rcar_can_probe() a bit.
> 
>> If you change the message, why don't you make it consistent
>> ("interrupt" vs. "IRQ")?
> 
>     I decided to change the message in a follow-up patch (posted afterwards).

Please squash you patches, so that you don't modify code (or error
messages) that you've added in a previous patch.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (456 bytes)