[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561297B4.8000403@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 08:31:00 -0700
From: santosh shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ssantosh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] RDS: defer the over_batch work to send worker
On 10/5/2015 3:30 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:24:24 -0400
>
>> @@ -423,7 +423,9 @@ over_batch:
>> !list_empty(&conn->c_send_queue)) &&
>> send_gen == conn->c_send_gen) {
>> rds_stats_inc(s_send_lock_queue_raced);
>> - goto restart;
>> + if (batch_count < 1024)
>> + goto restart;
>> + queue_delayed_work(rds_wq, &conn->c_send_w, 1);
>
> Sorry, you can't just use a magic number like this.
>
> You have to describe, in detail, exactly how this value was
> choosen, derived, and tested to be effeective and in exactly
> what environment those tests were done.
>
> You must also use a mnenomic for this value rather than a
> raw magic constant.
>
Right. Infact If I look at it now again, there is already a batch
count parameter which is module parameter. I will use that in
this hunk as well as the other couple places and send an update.
Thanks for review !!
Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists